Pages

.

Ayurvedic Herbal And Natural Treatment For Type 2 Diabetes (jhon peterj)

Diabetes refers to a body condition under which an individual contains high blood sugar. It is really a metabolic diseases caused due to the pancreas producing insufficient insulin or because cells not responding to the insulin produced. The diabetes has been categorized as Type 1, Type 2, gestational, and a few other types. While Type 1 diabetes is the outcome of body's inability to produce insulin, and the person afflicted has to get injected insulin in his body. A woman getting affected with high blood sugar during pregnancy is gestational diabetes while Type 2 diabetes is the result of body becoming insulin resistant, and cells are unable to use the insulin produced. The condition is generally accompanied with insufficient production of insulin in the body.

Thus, Type 2 diabetes is characterized by two adverse conditions, one insufficient production of insulin and two cells failing to use the insulin produced. The early signs are frequent urination, and increased hunger and thirst, while chronic Type 2 diabetes can produce serious complications like renal failure, heart attack, and retinal damage. Hence, it is necessary that the blood sugar level under this type of diabetes is kept within the prescribed range.

There are numerous medication avenues available to treat this type of disease. Injecting insulin is a way of treating diabetes while there are also various pills and tablets for that available in the market. However, all these medications including insulin do not cure the disease, but they only manage the symptoms. Moreover, there are definite side effects of these medications. Hence, one can safely go for Ayurvedic treatment of this type of disease. Ayurvedic system is based on natural herbs, plants, and roots with immense medicinal properties that effectively take care of root causes of the problem.


Diabkil capsule is relevant in this connection as it is an Ayurvedic herbal preparation containing natural herbs as its constituents. Those herbs are highly effective in lowering the blood sugar level under Type 2 diabetes. The herbs include Karela, Methi, Jaiphal, Kesar, and Haldi to name a few. These herbs take care of insulin production by enhancing production of Beta cells in the pancreas. They also energize and propel cells to utilize the insulin produced. Thus, the capsule is highly effective not only in lowering blood sugar level but also in controlling cholesterol and blood pressure. It propels production of good cholesterol and helps reduce bad ones. Hence, two Diabkil capsules twice daily is recommended to be taken for four months to get the best of results in this type of diabetes. Processing ...
reade more... Résuméabuiyad

Fixing a Mediocre Movie

If ever it were possible (which it seldom is) for sublime acting to elevate an otherwise unremarkable film to the status of a minor classic, it surely would have happened in the case of The Last Station, the well-intentioned 2009 Tolstoy biopic that brought Oscar and Golden Globe nominations (but no wins) to Christopher Plummer and Helen Mirren for their commanding portrayals of Leo and Sofya Tolstoy. The performances were genuinely excellent. Alas, the movie was not. It's fair to ask why not, because on the surface, you'd think any movie about the life of the greatest international celebrity of the 19th century (which Tolstoy surely was) couldn't fail to be a compelling tale. But sadly, like Tolstoy's own final journey by rail, The Last Station falls far short of its ultimate destination, leaving the passenger (the moviegoer) stranded and wanting for a place to hang his or her shapka, so to speak.

The ingredients are there: strong characters, conflict, intrigue, deception, drama. Leo Tolstoy, at age 81, was trying desperately to simplify his increasingly complex professional and family life. He had long since signed over his worldly possessions (including the family estate, Yasnaya Polyana) to the care of his wife. But he also secretly conspired, with the aid of his devoted disciple, Vladimir Grigoryevich Chertkov, to concoct a secret will that would have his literary properties go to the public domain. Of course, Sofya was no fool and saw through her husband's multiple attempts to write her out of the literary inheritance. The Last Station is the story of Sonya's descent into near-madness (and Leo's final, abortive attempt to escape the madness) as Chertkov wrests control of the Tolstoy literary legacy from Sonya. Leo boards a train, at the end, seeking to put physical distance (as much of it as possible) between himself and his wife. By the time he reaches Astapovo, the last station on the rail line, he is deathly ill with pneumonia. His wife arrives at Astapovo just in time to see him die.

The problem with The Last Station, as a movie, is that writer-director Michael Hoffman (working from Jay Parini's novel) chose to give us an extremely narrow snapshot of an enormous subject, more or less like trying to capture the Grand Canyon with a 1952 Brownie camera. The movie not only doesn't try to give us a significant slice of Tolstoy's life, it's actually happy to focus in on just a few weeks (the final weeks) of the great man's story. What's worse, the story is told through the eyes of a rather insignificant character, Tolstoy's replacement secretary (replacing N. N. Gusev, who was for a short time imprisoned), the young Valentin Bulgakov. Along the way, we're made to suffer through Bulgakov's own irrelevant romance with a young woman who's in no way related to Tolstoy (nor any other real-world character).

The movie thus fails on several levels. It fails, first, in not giving us a significant slice of Tolstoy's life. It merely presents the 81-year-old master to us as a world celebrity, ready-made, and expects us to bring significant knowledge of Tolstoy's backstory with us. The movie also distracts us from the main story by (as I said) forcing us to watch an utterly forgettable romantic side-plot that never intersects the main plot. But the movie also fails to show off the true main character of any movie (of whatever scope) about any great Russian writer: namely, Mother Russia herself.

It may be unfair to compare a movie of The Last Station's modest aspirations (and equally modest budget: $17 million) with David Lean's unforgettable cinematic rendition of Boris Pasternak's Doctor Zhivago (which cost $11 million in 1965 dollars), but the fact is, no one who has seen Doctor Zhivago will fail, consciously or unconsciously, to make the comparison in his or her mind between the Lean movie and any subsequent movie involving an iconic Russian figure. The striking thing (one of many) about Doctor Zhivago is that at no time in the movie can the viewer be unaware of the looming presence of that "other main character," bigger than life, Russia herself. Unfortunately, and crucially, we lose that essential character in The Last Station, and without it, the story of Tolstoy's final weeks seems like little more than thin domestic farce.

It's easy to spew out criticism. How to fix it? What could the writer-director have done to rescue The Last Station from the clutches of mediocrity (aside from rewriting it as a stage play)? In particular, how could it have been improved without expanding the story into a Zhivago-like epic spanning the whole of Tolstoy's life?

I think first of all it's necessary (and sufficient, for this limited-budget film) to tell the story of Tolstoy's last ten years, rather than his final year. By dispensing with the trivial Bulgakov character (and his meaningless romance) we save many feet of film that could be better put to use telling the story through the eyes of Tolstoy's personal physician, Dushan Makovitsky, a decidedly pivotal figure in the drama.

The (rewritten) story opens 24 February 1901, at a train station in St. Petersburg, where nameless nobodies come and go, among them a young nobody who, while waiting for his train, carefully (which is to say, first looking to see that no one is watching him) slides a book out of his coat and begins to read it. The book: a copy of Tolstoy's banned The Kingdom of God Is Within You.

A nearby church bell tolls. We cut to the interior of the Cathedral of Our Lady (St. Petersburg) where a grave-looking Metropolitan Anthony ascends the pulpit to read the document officially excommunicating Count Lev Nickolayevich Tolstoy from the Orthodox Church.

Cut to a villa at Gaspra, on the Black Sea. It's September 1901. At the insistence of his physician, Tolstoy has come to Crimea to recuperate from malaria. He's joined at the seaside villa not only by his family but by Anton Chekhov and Maxim Gorky. (All of this is true, by the way.)

Chekhov, shaking his head, looks up from his newspaper. "It's been seven months,
Lev Nickolayevich, and they're still writing about the excommunication!"

At the time of his death in 1910, Tolstoy was arguably the
best-known celebrity in the world.

At this point, there is ample room to discuss the reasons for the excommunication. Tolstoy has been writing books and tracts (most famously, The Kingdom of God Is Within You) blasting the church's version of Christianity, putting forth his own no-nonsense, no-miracles, no-hocus-pocus version of the Gospels, emphasizing the Sermon on the Mount and its call for turning the other cheek and repudiating violence. Tolstoy has turned Jesus's teachings against the church, by pointing out that no one who advocates violence (even in a just cause) is adhering to Jesus's teachings.

Tolstoy's own fundamentalism has not only gotten him in hot water with the Church (and the Tsar), it has spawned a Christian anarchism movement that has, by 1901, circled the globe. In Russia, believers in Tolstoy's version of Christianity are refusing military service in significant numbers. In England and elsewhere, acolytes have formed "Tolstoyan colonies." One of Tolstoy's most ardent followers, at home, is (of course) Vladimir Chertkov, who will remain a lifelong disciple, creating the first English-language editions of Tolstoy's works and publishing inexpensive editions of his books both in England and in Russia (resulting in ten years of exile for Chertkov).

Tolstoy's religious fervor, seen by his wife as incomprehensible, is ultimately what powers the bond with Chertkov, the rift with Sofya, and Tolstoy's own mad quest to shed worldly belongings before he dies. By making this aspect of Tolstoy's life clear, The Last Station (properly remade) could give life to the motivations of its characters and make clear why so many Russians considered Tolstoy a living saint.

As part of his creed, Tolstoy advocated celibacy, vegetarianism, and repudiation of worldly goods. He strongly agreed with Proudhon that "property is theft." Once this fact is known, it becomes possible, in a remake of The Last Station, to put Tolstoy's philosophy in historical context. Thus it becomes relevant to include in such a movie a scene (for example) of the 150,000 people who marched on the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg in January 1905. These were not card-carrying Bolsheviks but ordinary people, many of whom had been inspired by Tolstoy's (not just Marx's) philosophy.

I can think of many powerful scenes that would make sense in a film that attempts to capture Tolstoy's final decade rather than his final six months of life. By slavishly adhering to Parini's novel, screenwriter-director Hoffman reinquished any opportunity he might have had to do the Tolstoy story justice in The Last Station. We end up with melodrama instead of drama, narrow provinciality instead of sweeping grandeur, and poor Mother Russia herself reduced to a forgotten stepsister, when in fact the stage—like the characters—could not, in this case, have
possibly been any bigger.
reade more... Résuméabuiyad

How to Comfort Someone With Bipolar Disorder

Dealing with someone who has bipolar disorder requires knowledge, understanding and an extra dose of patience. People with bipolar disorder experience episodes of depression and mania that can lead to irresponsible and risky behaviors, which can be challenging to live with. Despite their best intentions, many family members and friends of people affected with this illness don't really understand the condition or how to provide much needed support, says Muffy Walker, MSN, MBA, founder and president of the International Bipolar Foundation (IBPF).


In order to increase the public's knowledgeable about bipolar disorder and dispel the stigma that exists around it, IBPF and the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance are partnering to promote the Say it Forward campaign. This international social media effort, which runs from September 30 to October 10, 2013, provides an avenue to share key facts about mental and emotional illnesses with a broader audience via email and social media websites.

"Say it Forward allows you send a message to your friends and family that will educate them about the mental illness and hopefully diminish the devastating effects of the negativity surrounding it," Walker says. The goal for this year's effort is to reach 20,000 people around the world. The campaign takes place during International Bipolar Awareness Day (October 10, 2013), so it's also a particularly timely opportunity to reach out to people affected by the condition and encourage them to explore the array of treatment options that exist today.


Hurtful words can be painful, too and while the focus of the campaign is on what you should say to raise awareness of bipolar disorder, Walker also stresses that what you shouldn't say to people struggling with the symptoms of this condition is just as essential.

Understanding that bipolar disorder is an illness that affects the brain—and the loved one's behavior—may help you act with more compassion and patience. With that in mind, here are statements Walker suggests avoiding:

1. You must be "crazy" or "mentally ill."
Blanket pronouncements or stereotypes such as these can make someone with bipolar disease feel badly about herself and frustrated, too. Referring to someone as crazy is a judgment that conveys you find her lacking as a person. Remember that bipolar disease is an actual disease just like cancer and diabetes, and the person living with it deserves the same type of compassion—not judgment—that you would offer to someone with these or other illnesses.

2. Why don't you have a more positive attitude? Such a loaded question can make a person feel as though she should be better able to control her condition and since she can't, she may feel ashamed of herself. To avoid causing this type of reaction, it's important to know that the symptoms of bipolar disease can't be "willed away" any more than you can will away the symptoms of the flu. The good news is that a combination of medication and cognitive or behavioral therapy can be effective in helping to manage the condition. And when the person feels better, her attitude will likely be better, too.

3. You need to have better control of yourself.
Bipolar disease often leads to episodes of hyperactivity or mania (such as going on an excessive shopping spree or trip) that he or she isn't able to control. Therefore, if you see the person exhibiting dramatic behavior that you find very frustrating, you need to remind yourself that this is being caused by the illness and not something she deliberately set out to do. Rather than judging her, take this opportunity to encourage the person to seek professional help and/or take medication to get control of the mood swings and impulsiveness.

4. No one will ever be able to put up with you. Many people with bipolar disease have a deep-seeded fear that they won't ever sustain close friendships and relationships because of their mood swings and unpredictable behavior. However, with proper treatment, she should be able to manage her condition and develop a loving relationship and close friends. You can be there to listen to her fears and help to alleviate them by reminding her that she has people in her life that care.

5. You're just going through a bad time and it will pass soon. While bipolar disorder can be effectively managed, scientists have not yet found a cure, although more research is ongoing and this may change in the future. In the meantime, recognize that the person affected will have both good and bad periods of time. Be careful not to downplay the illness or act like it's just a temporary state, since this can leave the affected person feeling like she must have failed if she can't shake it off on her own. Walker recommends acknowledging the reality of the condition and reassuring the person that you will always be there for her when she needs you.


To learn more about bipolar disorder and the current treatment options, or to participate in the "Say it Forward" campaign, visit IBPF's website.

Muffy Walker reviewed this article.


Source:

International Bipolar Foundation
Muffy Walker, MSN, MBA, email interview 15 Sept 2013 and "Healthy Living With Bipolar Disorder," accessed 17 Sept 2013
http://www.internationalbipolarfoundation.org/‎

reade more... Résuméabuiyad

Internet Quotations


reade more... Résuméabuiyad

5 Ways to Turn Your Thinking Around

There's someone who talks to you all the time who has the power to change your life. She constantly gives her opinion and comments on everything you do from your job performance and parenting skills to your personal appearance and dreams for the future. If that person has supportive, positive things to say, you can achieve anything you want in life. If she is negative, nagging and critical however, she can destroy you. Who is that someone? It's you.

Self-talk describes the way you talk to yourself. It's that little voice inside your head that says, "You look awesome today," or "I can't believe you wore that out of the house." It's that running commentary that fuels our actions, the way we think about ourselves, how well we function and what we achieve. While many people think they have no control over their self-talk, the fact is, it's almost entirely under your control. That is, if you train your brain to "talk nice."

Follow these five tips for turning negative self-talk into powerful and positive self-talk:

Notice if you're spending most of your time saying positive, uplifting things like, "You totally rocked that," or negative, critical things like, "You are so stupid." Jot notes throughout your day on what your inner voice is saying. Then, conduct an inventory. If most of your self-talk is positive, pay attention to any areas that could be improved and keep up the good work. If your self-talk is insulting, critical and mean, it's time to ditch that bad habit.

Whenever you notice yourself engaging in negative self-talk, stop yourself mid-thought and think, "Stop!" or some other word that puts a hard stop on self-abuse. Maybe your word is, silence, kindness, or even mind your manners. The point is to stand up for yourself and call a truce with your inner-bully.

Some negative self-talk can be useful, as long as it's not self-destructive. For instance, if you realize you've made a mistake and catch yourself saying, "Dude, you blew it," grab that thought and label it "mistake." In this example, "you blew it," sends a signal that you need to amend a mistake. If you catch yourself saying, "nothing good ever happens to me," label that "pity" and ask yourself why you're feeling so sorry for yourself. Whether it's a "mistake" or "pity," find a way to amend the problem rather than let negative self-talk bring you down.

Whenever you catch yourself engaging in mean self-talk and after you've put a stop to it, turn that thought around and say something compassionate and kind. For example, when you catch yourself thinking, "You just made a fool of yourself," say, "Stop," then reframe that thought to: "Not your best moment, but you did just fine." No need to go over the top or be insincere, but you do need to be kind, compassionate, and polite. Talk to yourself the way you would your best friend. LeslieBeth Wish, psychologist and author of Smart Relationships asks, "If your friend told you she uses the same negative words about herself, how would you respond? What encouraging tips would you give her? Now use this advice to your friend for yourself!" She says this technique works because we are often blind to our own issues. We tend to see them better when they are—or appear—to be happening to someone else.

Start your day by looking in the mirror and paying yourself a compliment. Look yourself right in your eyes and say, "Looking good, my friend" or "you are so amazing, you're about to create your best day ever." Then, pepper your day with self-compliments and mini-motivational lectures that keep your spirits high.

Once you've trained your brain to be nice to yourself, go further and train yourself to dream big, think grand thoughts and provide yourself all the praise, encouragement and support you need to make those dreams come true. As Dale Carnegie once said, "It isn't what you have, or who you are, or where you are, or what you are doing that makes you happy or unhappy. It is what you think about."

LeslieBeth Wish, EDD, MSS, reviewed this article.

reade more... Résuméabuiyad

Co-Counseling: A DIY Option for Psychological Help

You've been fighting with your husband, your kids are driving you crazy, and work has been stressful. You don't want to invest in long-term therapy but you wish you had someone objective you could talk to; someone who could support you as you sort out your feelings. Sound familiar? If so, co-counseling could be worth considering.

"Co-counseling is a peer group of people who offer support for personal change based on reciprocal peer counseling," explains Lisa Brateman, LCSW, a psychotherapist and relationship specialist in private practice in New York City. "The original ideas around co-counseling consisted of understanding the patterns of behavior that cause distress, and recognizing how to release suppressed feelings by emotional discharge of past traumas," Brateman says. This alternative approach began in the 1950s and unlike traditional counseling, which is led by a mental health professional, in co-counseling, participants take turns serving as the counselor and the client, listening to and helping each other process their situations and decide how to deal with them.

In a typical peer-to-peer or co-counseling session, each person takes equal time to be the counselor and the client, so both participants have a chance to listen and to be heard. "The client leads his own session, while the counselor acts as an active listener, occasionally guiding the conversation without passing judgment. As the client talks about his issues, he can gain a better understanding of himself and his situation. Many people find that serving as both the counselor and client in turn can be very rewarding and effective.

The approach used in co-counseling makes this a viable alternative for people who don't feel comfortable with psychotherapy. "Peer-to-peer can feel more like a support group, which may feel safer to them," Brateman says.

Co-counseling may also appeal to people who want to avoid the expense of more traditional therapy options. Sessions are generally free—but you will need to invest in a training course to learn both the guidelines, and how to handle both roles most effectively. The initial training usually costs no more than a few hundred dollars, though over time some people also take inexpensive workshops or other continuing education offerings to hone their skills.

Brateman says that people who have insight will be most likely to benefit the most from the co-counseling process. It's not an appropriate fit, though, for anyone

with deep psychological issues prone to high-risk behaviors grappling with addictions

In any of these situations, she stresses the need for the person to be seen by a mental health counselor.

With peer-to-peer counseling, "There can also be a risk with regards to detecting potential signs of violence," she warns. Therefore, if you have any concerns, you'll want to skip co-counseling and seek out the advice of an expert instead.

For many people, co-counseling can be a good option. To find out more and to connect with a network in your area, you can visit Co-Counseling International's website, or search online for groups that serve your region. You can also find out about upcoming trainings and learn how to connect with the peer-counseling network.

Lisa Brateman, LCSW, reviewed this article. 

Sources:

Co-Counseling International USA. "Are You Ready?" Web. 9 May 2013. Page accessed 16 July 2013.
http://cci-usa.org/what_is.htm

reade more... Résuméabuiyad

Is default moral? Assorted thoughts

These guys don’t look very moral to me.
Deficits is a wonderfully crazy collection of conference papers edited by Charles Rowley, Robert Tollison and the late “Nobel” Laureate James M. Buchanan. It has been called “the Rosetta Stone of insane conservatism”, and it contains a chapter on the Ethics of Debt Default. Matt O’Brien has promised me a piece on it which hasn’t appeared yet—he assures me that he will not default on this obligation because default is immoral—but I have some thoughts in response to what I think he will write that I might forget, so here goes. Besides, it’s easier to formulate a response to something if you haven’t read it.

  1. During the financial crisis there was a lot of discussion about whether it would be ethical for underwater homeowners to default and walk away from their mortgages, especially in no-recourse states. The legal scholars were generally agnostic on the ethics: from their point of view, a mortgage loan is a contract, breaching a contract is not even illegal (it would simply expose you to damages), and something that is not illegal cannot be wrong. Liberal types tended to favor this sort of strategy because it would alleviate misery.
  2. Conservative and libertarian types, perhaps because it could be good for poor people, railed against any sort of effort to encourage homeowners to do default. The argument goes something like this: There is a social contract that borrowers will try to stay current on their loans and not default. This social contract cannot be enforced in a court, but if it is broken, it will inevitably lead to higher mortgage interest rates because it would change the behavioral assumptions about default that are used when interest rates are set. If borrowers start defaulting willy-nilly, they will hurt themselves in the long run.
  3. I basically think that analysis is correct, even if I might disagree with the conclusions. I do, however, worry about the ethics of encouraging one group of borrowers [not] to do something for the benefit of a larger, and possibly different, group. The people we would be encouraging to default probably would not be able to borrow again for a while, no matter what they do.
  4. Some (subblog!) even tried to argue that strategic default by corporations is perfectly fine. Default is only bad if individuals do it.
  5. Buchanan makes a moral argument for the US defaulting on its debt, or maybe just half its debt. In my reading, he stops short of actually advocating for default, but the whole theme of the book points in that direction.
  6. Matt thinks that default is immoral and Buchanan is nuts. (This is a danger of responding to something that hasn’t been written yet: maybe his views aren’t that strong.)
  7. Is it moral for individual underwater homeowners to default strategically? Yes.
  8. Is it moral for the United States to default to make a point about the Affordable Care Act? No.
  9. Is it ever moral for the United States to default? In the present situation, default wouldn’t serve any useful fiscal purpose. Trust-with-a-capital-T is important: we should fulfill the obligations we incur. With the possible exception of the most questionable loans, we should expect borrowers to pay what they owe. But part of the implicit contract was also that they could default if they had to and were willing to suffer the consequences. There’s a reason we call it the default option. Many homeowners were (are?) in a desperate situation where they could clearly benefit from defaulting.
  10. The implicit contract for US government debt is different. While a subprime or credit card lender knows that the borrower might default, the expectation on both sides of the US Treasury debt contract is that there will never be a default. In a sense, the US government has promised never to default, a promise that regular borrowers—whether they are individuals or corporations—do not and cannot make.
  11. The US does not actually benefit fiscally from defaulting right now. Would default be more moral or advisable if the United States were in a situation where debt is high, interest rates are high, but deficits are low, so there would be some conceivable benefit from defaulting? I am not sure.
Update: Read this, this and this from Matt Bruenig.
    reade more... Résuméabuiyad